T. M. Stace

Decoherence errors arising from noisy environments remain a central obstacle to progress in quantum computation and information processing. Quantum error correction (QEC) based on the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) protocol offers a powerful strategy to overcome this challenge, with successful demonstrations in trapped ions, superconducting circuits, and photonics. Beyond active QEC, a compelling alternative is to engineer Hamiltonians that intrinsically enforce stabilizers, offering passive protection akin to topological models. Inspired by the GKP encoding scheme, we implement a superconducting qubit whose eigenstates form protected grid states - long envisioned but not previously realized - by integrating an effective Cooper-quartet junction with a quantum phase-slip element embedded in a high-impedance circuit. Spectroscopic measurements reveal pairs of degenerate states separated by large energy gaps, in excellent agreement with theoretical predictions. Remarkably, our observations indicate that the circuit tolerates small disorders and gains robustness against environmental noise as its parameters approach the ideal regime, establishing a new framework for exploring superconducting hardware. These findings also showcase the versatility of the superconducting circuit toolbox, setting the stage for future exploration of advanced solid-state devices with emergent properties.

Quantum error correction provides a path to large-scale quantum computers, but is built on challenging assumptions about the characteristics of the underlying errors. In particular, the mathematical assumption of statistically independent errors in quantum logic operations is at odds with realistic environments where error sources may exhibit strong temporal and spatial correlations. We present experiments using trapped ions to demonstrate that the use of dynamically corrected gates (DCGs), generally considered for the reduction of error magnitudes, can also suppress error correlations in space and time throughout quantum circuits. We present a first-principles analysis of the manifestation of error correlations in randomized benchmarking, and validate this model through experiments performed using engineered errors. We find that standard DCGs can reduce error correlations by $\sim50\times$, while increasing the magnitude of uncorrelated errors by a factor scaling linearly with the extended DCG duration compared to a primitive gate. We then demonstrate that the correlation characteristics of intrinsic errors in our system are modified by use of DCGs, consistent with a picture in which DCGs whiten the effective error spectrum induced by external noise.

Quantum error correction provides a path to large-scale quantum computers, but is built on challenging assumptions about the characteristics of the underlying errors. In particular, the mathematical assumption of independent errors in quantum logic operations is at odds with realistic environments where error-sources may exhibit strong temporal correlations. We present experiments enabling the identification of error correlations between operations in quantum circuits, using only projective measurements at the end of the circuit. Using a single trapped ion qubit and engineered noise with tunable temporal correlations, we identify a clear signature of error correlations between sequential gates in randomly composed quantum circuits, and extract quantitative measures linked to the underlying noise correlation length. By replacing all gates in these circuits with "virtual" dynamically corrected gates (DCGs), we demonstrate that even in the presence of strongly correlated noise the signatures of error correlations between sequential gates appear similar to standard gates exposed to uncorrelated noise. A theoretical model applied to our experiments reveals that common DCGs suppress the correlated error component by over $270\times$ with $95\%$ confidence. Using block-correlated noise, we explore the scaling of the effective error correlation length at the virtual level, and show that DCGs exhibit error correlations indistinguishable from those arising from uncorrelated noise.

Growth in the complexity and capabilities of quantum information hardware mandates access to practical techniques for performance verification that function under realistic laboratory conditions. Here we experimentally characterise the impact of common temporally correlated noise processes on both randomised benchmarking (RB) and gate-set tomography (GST). We study these using an analytic toolkit based on a formalism mapping noise to errors for arbitrary sequences of unitary operations. This analysis highlights the role of sequence structure in enhancing or suppressing the sensitivity of quantum verification protocols to either slowly or rapidly varying noise, which we treat in the limiting cases of quasi-DC miscalibration and white noise power spectra. We perform experiments with a single trapped $^{171}$Yb$^{+}$ ion as a qubit and inject engineered noise ($\propto σ^z$) to probe protocol performance. Experiments on RB validate predictions that the distribution of measured fidelities over sequences is described by a gamma distribution varying between approximately Gaussian for rapidly varying noise, and a broad, highly skewed distribution for the slowly varying case. Similarly we find a strong gate set dependence of GST in the presence of correlated errors, leading to significant deviations between estimated and calculated diamond distances in the presence of correlated $σ^z$ errors. Numerical simulations demonstrate that expansion of the gate set to include negative rotations can suppress these discrepancies and increase reported diamond distances by orders of magnitude for the same error processes. Similar effects do not occur for correlated $σ^x$ or $σ^y$ errors or rapidly varying noise processes, highlighting the critical interplay of selected gate set and the gauge optimisation process on the meaning of the reported diamond norm in correlated noise environments.