Yuwei Jin

Fault-tolerant execution of error-corrected quantum algorithms

Michael A. Perlin [1], Zichang He [1], Anthony Alexiades Armenakas [1], Pablo Andres-Martinez [2], Tianyi Hao [1], Dylan Herman, Yuwei Jin [1], Karl Mayer [3], Chris Self [2], David Amaro [2], Ciaran Ryan-Anderson [3], Ruslan Shaydulin [1]

Abstract

Scaling up quantum algorithms to tackle high-impact problems in science and industry requires quantum error correction and fault tolerance. While progress has been made in experimentally realizing error-corrected primitives, the end-to-end execution of logical quantum algorithms using only fault-tolerant (FT) components has remained out of reach. We demonstrate the FT and error-corrected execution of two quantum algorithms, the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) and the Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd (HHL) algorithm applied to the Poisson equation, on Quantinuum H2 and Helios trapped-ion quantum processors using the $[[7,1,3]]$ Steane code. For QAOA circuits on 5 and 6 logical qubits, we show performance improvements from increasing the number of QAOA layers and the number of $T$ gates used to approximate logical rotations, despite increased physical circuit complexity. We further show that QAOA circuits with up to 8 logical qubits and 9 logical $T$ gates perform similarly to unencoded circuits. For the largest QAOA circuits we run, with 12 logical (97 physical) qubits and 2132 physical two-qubit gates, we still observe better-than-random performance. Finally, we show that adding active QEC cycles and increasing the repeat-until-success limit of state preparation subroutines can improve the performance of a quantum algorithm, thereby demonstrating critical capabilities of scalable FT quantum computation. Our results are enabled by an FT logical $T$ gate implementation with an infidelity of $\sim 2.6(4)\times10^{-3}$ and dynamic circuits with measurement-dependent feedback. Our work demonstrates near-break-even performance of complex, error-corrected algorithmic quantum circuits using only FT components.

Certified randomness amplification by dynamically probing remote random quantum states

Minzhao Liu [1], Pradeep Niroula [1], Matthew DeCross [2], Cameron Foreman [3], Wen Yu Kon [1], Ignatius William Primaatmaja [1,2], M. S. Allman, J. P. Campora, Akhil Isanaka [2], Kartik Singhal [2], Omar Amer [1], Shouvanik Chakrabarti [1], Kaushik Chakraborty [1], Samuel F. Cooper [2], Robert D. Delaney [2], Joan M. Dreiling [2], Brian Estey [2], Caroline Figgatt [2], Cameron Foltz [2], John P. Gaebler [2], Alex Hall [2], Zichang He [1], Craig A. Holliman [4], Travis S. Humble [5], Shih-Han Hung [6], Ali A. Husain [7], Yuwei Jin [1], Fatih Kaleoglu [1], Colin J. Kennedy [2], Nikhil Kotibhaskar [3], Nathan K. Lysne [4], Ivaylo S. Madjarov [2], Michael Mills [2], Alistair R. Milne [3], Kevin Milner [3], Louis Narmour [2], Sivaprasad Omanakuttan [1], Annie J. Park [2], Michael A. Perlin [1], Adam P. Reed [2], Chris N. Self [8], Matthew Steinberg [1], David T. Stephen [2], Joseph Sullivan [1], Alex Chernoguzov [2], Florian J. Curchod [8], Anthony Ransford [2], Justin G. Bohnet [2], Brian Neyenhuis [2], Michael Foss-Feig [2], Rob Otter [1], Ruslan Shaydulin [1]

Abstract

Cryptography depends on truly unpredictable numbers, but physical sources emit biased or correlated bits. Quantum mechanics enables the amplification of imperfect randomness into nearly perfect randomness, but prior demonstrations have required physically co-located, loophole-free Bell tests, constraining the feasibility of remote operation. Here we realize certified randomness amplification across a network by dynamically probing large, entangled quantum states on Quantinuum's 98-qubit Helios trapped-ion quantum processor. Our protocol is secure even if the remote device acts maliciously or is compromised by an intercepting adversary, provided the samples are generated quickly enough to preclude classical simulation of the quantum circuits. We stream quantum gates in real time to the quantum processor, maintain quantum state coherence for $\approx 0.9$ seconds, and then reveal the measurement bases to the quantum processor only milliseconds before measurement. This limits the time for classical spoofing to 30 ms and constrains the location of hypothetical adversaries to a $4{,}500$ km radius. We achieve a fidelity of 0.586 on random circuits with 64 qubits and 276 two-qubit gates, enabling the amplification of realistic imperfect randomness with a low entropy rate into nearly perfect randomness.

Iceberg Beyond the Tip: Co-Compilation of a Quantum Error Detection Code and a Quantum Algorithm

Yuwei Jin, Zichang He, Tianyi Hao, Sivaprasad Omanakuttan, David Amaro, Swamit Tannu, Ruslan Shaydulin, Marco Pistoia [1]

Abstract

The rapid progress in quantum hardware is expected to make them viable tools for the study of quantum algorithms in the near term. The timeline to useful algorithmic experimentation can be accelerated by techniques that use many noisy shots to produce an accurate estimate of the observable of interest. One such technique is to encode the quantum circuit using an error detection code and discard the samples for which an error has been detected. An underexplored property of error-detecting codes is the flexibility in the circuit encoding and fault-tolerant gadgets, which enables their co-optimization with the algorthmic circuit. However, standard circuit optimization tools cannot be used to exploit this flexibility as optimization must preserve the fault-tolerance of the gadget. In this work, we focus on the $[[k+2, k, 2]]$ Iceberg quantum error detection code, which is tailored to trapped-ion quantum processors. We design new flexible fault-tolerant gadgets for the Iceberg code, which we then co-optimize with the algorithmic circuit for the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) using tree search. By co-optimizing the QAOA circuit and the Iceberg gadgets, we achieve an improvement in QAOA success probability from $44\%$ to $65\%$ and an increase in post-selection rate from $4\%$ to $33\%$ at 22 algorithmic qubits, utilizing 330 algorithmic two-qubit gates and 744 physical two-qubit gates on the Quantinuum H2-1 quantum computer, compared to the previous state-of-the-art hardware demonstration. Furthermore, we demonstrate better-than-unencoded performance for up to 34 algorithmic qubits, employing 510 algorithmic two-qubit gates and 1140 physical two-qubit gates.