Conor Delaney

Helios: A 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer

Anthony Ransford [1], M. S. Allman, Jake Arkinstall [2,1], J. P. Campora, Samuel F. Cooper [1], Robert D. Delaney [1], Joan M. Dreiling [1], Brian Estey [1], Caroline Figgatt [1], Alex Hall [1], Ali A. Husain [3], Akhil Isanaka [1], Colin J. Kennedy [1], Nikhil Kotibhaskar [4], Ivaylo S. Madjarov [1], Karl Mayer [1], Alistair R. Milne [4], Annie J. Park [1], Adam P. Reed [1], Riley Ancona [1], Molly P. Andersen [5], Pablo Andres-Martinez [2], Will Angenent [2], Liz Argueta [1], Benjamin Arkin [1], Leonardo Ascarrunz [1], William Baker [1], Corey Barnes [1], John Bartolotta [1], Jordan Berg [1], Ryan Besand [1], Bryce Bjork [1], Matt Blain [5], Paul Blanchard [1], Robin Blume-Kohout [6], Matt Bohn [1,2], Agustin Borgna, Daniel Y. Botamanenko [1], Robert Boutelle [1], Natalie Brown [1], Grant T. Buckingham [1], Nathaniel Q. Burdick [3], William Cody Burton [1], Varis Carey [1], Christopher J. Carron [5], Joe Chambers [1], John Children [2], Victor E. Colussi [1], Steven Crepinsek [1], Andrew Cureton [1], Joe Davies [5], Daniel Davis [1], Matthew DeCross [1], David Deen [3], Conor Delaney [1], Davide DelVento [1], B. J. DeSalvo, Jason Dominy [1], Ross Duncan [7], Vanya Eccles [2], Alec Edgington [2], Neal Erickson [1], Stephen Erickson [1], Christopher T. Ertsgaard [5], Bruce Evans [1], Tyler Evans [1], Maya I. Fabrikant [1], Andrew Fischer [1], Cameron Foltz [1], Michael Foss-Feig [1], David Francois [1], Brad Freyberg [1], Charles Gao [1], Robert Garay [1], Jane Garvin [1], David M. Gaudiosi [1], Christopher N. Gilbreth [1], Josh Giles [1], Erin Glynn [1], Jeff Graves [1], Azure Hansen [1], David Hayes [1], Lukas Heidemann [2], Bob Higashi [5], Tyler Hilbun [1], Jordan Hines [6], Ariana Hlavaty [2], Kyle Hoffman [1], Ian M. Hoffman [1], Craig Holliman [7], Isobel Hooper [2], Bob Horning [5], James Hostetter [3], Daniel Hothem [8], Jack Houlton [1], Jared Hout [1], Ross Hutson [1], Ryan T. Jacobs [1], Trent Jacobs [1], Melf Johannsen [2], Jacob Johansen [1], Loren Jones [1], Sydney Julian [1], Ryan Jung [5], Aidan Keay [2], Todd Klein [5], Mark Koch [2], Ryo Kondo [1], Chang Kong [1], Asa Kosto [1], Alan Lawrence [2], David Liefer [1], Michelle Lollie [1], Dominic Lucchetti [1], Nathan K. Lysne [7], Christian Lytle [1], Callum MacPherson [2], Andrew Malm [1], Spencer Mather [1], Brian Mathewson [1], Daniel Maxwell [3], Lauren McCaffrey [1], Hannah McDougall [1], Robin Mendoza [1], Michael Mills [1], Richard Morrison [2], Louis Narmour [1], Nhung Nguyen [1], Lora Nugent [1], Scott Olson [5], Daniel Ouellette [5], Jeremy Parks [1], Zach Peters [1], Jessie Petricka [1], Juan M. Pino [1], Frank Polito [1], Matthias Preidl [5], Gabriel Price [1], Timothy Proctor [8], McKinley Pugh [1], Noah Ratcliff [1], Daisy Raymondson [1], Peter Rhodes [1], Conrad Roman [1], Craig Roy [2], Ciaran Ryan-Anderson [1], Fernando Betanzo Sanchez [2], George Sangiolo [2], Tatiana Sawadski [2], Andrew Schaffer [3], Peter Schow [1], Jon Sedlacek [3], Henry Semenenko [2], Peter Shevchuk [1], Susan Shore [5], Peter Siegfried [1], Kartik Singhal [1], Seyon Sivarajah [2], Thomas Skripka [1], Lucas Sletten [3], Ben Spaun [1], R. Tucker Sprenkle [1], Paul Stoufer [1], Mariel Tader [1], Stephen F. Taylor [3], Travis H. Thompson [2], Raanan Tobey [1], Anh Tran [1], Tam Tran [1], Grahame Vittorini [3], Curtis Volin [3], Jim Walker [1], Sam White [2], Douglas Wilson [2], Quinn Wolf [1], Chester Wringe [2], Kevin Young [8], Jian Zheng [1], Kristen Zuraski [1], Charles H. Baldwin [1], Alex Chernoguzov [1], John P. Gaebler [1], Steven J. Sanders [1], Brian Neyenhuis [1], Russell Stutz [1], Justin G. Bohnet [1]

Abstract

We report on Quantinuum Helios, a 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum processor based on the quantum charge-coupled device (QCCD) architecture. Helios features $^{137}$Ba$^{+}$ hyperfine qubits, all-to-all connectivity enabled by a rotatable ion storage ring connecting two quantum operation regions by a junction, speed improvements from parallelized operations, and a new software stack with real-time compilation of dynamic programs. Averaged over all operational zones in the system, we achieve average infidelities of $2.5(1)\times10^{-5}$ for single-qubit gates, $7.9(2)\times10^{-4}$ for two-qubit gates, and $4.8(6)\times10^{-4}$ for state preparation and measurement, none of which are fundamentally limited and likely able to be improved. These component infidelities are predictive of system-level performance in both random Clifford circuits and random circuit sampling, the latter demonstrating that Helios operates well beyond the reach of classical simulation and establishes a new frontier of fidelity and complexity for quantum computers.

Demonstration of quantum advantage by a joint detection receiver for optical communications using quantum belief propagation on a trapped-ion device

Conor Delaney [1], Kaushik P. Seshadreesan [2], Ian MacCormack [1,3,6], Alexey Galda [1,4], Saikat Guha [2], Prineha Narang [5]

Abstract

Demonstrations of quantum advantage have largely focused on computational speedups and on quantum simulation of many-body physics, limited by fidelity and capability of current devices. Discriminating laser-pulse-modulated classical-communication codewords at the minimum allowable probability of error using universal-quantum processing presents a promising parallel direction, one that is of both fundamental importance in quantum state discrimination, as well as of technological relevance in deep-space laser communications. Here we present an experimental realization of a quantum joint detection receiver for binary phase shift keying modulated codewords of a 3-bit linear tree code using a recently-proposed quantum algorithm: belief propagation with quantum messages. The receiver, translated to a quantum circuit, was experimentally implemented on a trapped-ion device -- the recently released Honeywell LT-1.0 system using ${}^{171}Yb+ $ ions, which possesses all-to-all connectivity and mid-circuit measurement capabilities that are essential to this demonstration. We conclusively realize a previously postulated but hitherto not-demonstrated joint quantum detection scheme, and provide an experimental framework that surpasses the quantum limit on the minimum average decoding error probability associated with pulse-by-pulse detection in the low mean photon number limit. The full joint-detection scheme bridges across photonic and trapped-ion based quantum information science, mapping the photonic coherent states of the modulation alphabet onto inner product-preserving states of single-ion qubits. Looking ahead, our work opens new avenues in hybrid realizations of quantum-enhanced receivers with applications in astronomy and emerging space-based platforms.

Branching Quantum Convolutional Neural Networks

Ian MacCormack [1,2,3], Conor Delaney [3], Alexey Galda [4,3], Nidhi Aggarwal [3], Prineha Narang [5]

Abstract

Neural network-based algorithms have garnered considerable attention in condensed matter physics for their ability to learn complex patterns from very high dimensional data sets towards classifying complex long-range patterns of entanglement and correlations in many-body quantum systems. Small-scale quantum computers are already showing potential gains in learning tasks on large quantum and very large classical data sets. A particularly interesting class of algorithms, the quantum convolutional neural networks (QCNN) could learn features of a quantum data set by performing a binary classification task on a nontrivial phase of quantum matter. Inspired by this promise, we present a generalization of QCNN, the branching quantum convolutional neural network, or bQCNN, with substantially higher expressibility. A key feature of bQCNN is that it leverages mid-circuit (intermediate) measurement results, realizable on current trapped-ion systems, obtained in pooling layers to determine which sets of parameters will be used in the subsequent convolutional layers of the circuit. This results in a branching structure, which allows for a greater number of trainable variational parameters in a given circuit depth. This is of particular use on current-day NISQ devices, where circuit depth is limited by gate noise. We present an overview of the ansatz structure and scaling, and provide evidence of its enhanced expressibility compared to QCNN. Using artificially-constructed large data sets of training states as a proof-of-concept we demonstrate the existence of training tasks in which bQCNN far outperforms an ordinary QCNN. Finally, we present future directions where the classical branching structure and increased density of trainable parameters in bQCNN would be particularly valuable.

Ground-state energy estimation of the water molecule on a trapped ion quantum computer

Yunseong Nam [1], Jwo-Sy Chen [1], Neal C. Pisenti [1], Kenneth Wright [1], Conor Delaney [1], Dmitri Maslov [2], Kenneth R. Brown [1,3], Stewart Allen [1], Jason M. Amini [1], Joel Apisdorf [1], Kristin M. Beck [1], Aleksey Blinov [1], Vandiver Chaplin [1], Mika Chmielewski [1,4], Coleman Collins [1], Shantanu Debnath [1], Andrew M. Ducore [1], Kai M. Hudek [1], Matthew Keesan [1], Sarah M. Kreikemeier [1], Jonathan Mizrahi [1], Phil Solomon [1], Mike Williams [1], Jaime David Wong-Campos [1], Christopher Monroe [1,4], Jungsang Kim [1,3]

Abstract

Quantum computing leverages the quantum resources of superposition and entanglement to efficiently solve computational problems considered intractable for classical computers. Examples include calculating molecular and nuclear structure, simulating strongly-interacting electron systems, and modeling aspects of material function. While substantial theoretical advances have been made in mapping these problems to quantum algorithms, there remains a large gap between the resource requirements for solving such problems and the capabilities of currently available quantum hardware. Bridging this gap will require a co-design approach, where the expression of algorithms is developed in conjunction with the hardware itself to optimize execution. Here, we describe a scalable co-design framework for solving chemistry problems on a trapped ion quantum computer, and apply it to compute the ground-state energy of the water molecule. The robust operation of the trapped ion quantum computer yields energy estimates with errors approaching the chemical accuracy, which is the target threshold necessary for predicting the rates of chemical reaction dynamics.