Peter Siegfried

Improving Dynamical Decoupling for Trapped-Ion QCCD Quantum Computers

William M. Watkins, Leigh M. Norris, Ross Hutson, Maxwell Urmey, Peter Siegfried, Charles H. Baldwin

Abstract

We examine the impact of scheduling errors on dynamical decoupling (DD) in trapped-ion quantum charge-coupled devices (QCCDs) and develop better strategies for reducing memory errors. In the QCCD architecture, qubit transport and control introduce stochastic pulse delays that impact the efficiency of DD. Using the filter-function formalism, we analyze the performance of DD in the presence of scheduling-induced timing errors, showing that they increase the sensitivity of standard DD to low-frequency fluctuations. For typical memory errors in trapped-ion platforms, we numerically demonstrate that increasing the DD pulse frequency beyond 2 Hz is generally counterproductive due to scheduling-induced timing errors. Furthermore, we introduce a real-time DD protocol that inserts refocusing pulses opportunistically during idle periods. We demonstrate our methods on Quantinuum H2-1 with Ramsey delay-type experiments.

Helios: A 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer

Anthony Ransford [1], M. S. Allman, Jake Arkinstall [2,1], J. P. Campora, Samuel F. Cooper [1], Robert D. Delaney [1], Joan M. Dreiling [1], Brian Estey [1], Caroline Figgatt [1], Alex Hall [1], Ali A. Husain [3], Akhil Isanaka [1], Colin J. Kennedy [1], Nikhil Kotibhaskar [4], Ivaylo S. Madjarov [1], Karl Mayer [1], Alistair R. Milne [4], Annie J. Park [1], Adam P. Reed [1], Riley Ancona [1], Molly P. Andersen [5], Pablo Andres-Martinez [2], Will Angenent [2], Liz Argueta [1], Benjamin Arkin [1], Leonardo Ascarrunz [1], William Baker [1], Corey Barnes [1], John Bartolotta [1], Jordan Berg [1], Ryan Besand [1], Bryce Bjork [1], Matt Blain [5], Paul Blanchard [1], Robin Blume-Kohout [6], Matt Bohn [1,2], Agustin Borgna, Daniel Y. Botamanenko [1], Robert Boutelle [1], Natalie Brown [1], Grant T. Buckingham [1], Nathaniel Q. Burdick [3], William Cody Burton [1], Varis Carey [1], Christopher J. Carron [5], Joe Chambers [1], John Children [2], Victor E. Colussi [1], Steven Crepinsek [1], Andrew Cureton [1], Joe Davies [5], Daniel Davis [1], Matthew DeCross [1], David Deen [3], Conor Delaney [1], Davide DelVento [1], B. J. DeSalvo, Jason Dominy [1], Ross Duncan [7], Vanya Eccles [2], Alec Edgington [2], Neal Erickson [1], Stephen Erickson [1], Christopher T. Ertsgaard [5], Bruce Evans [1], Tyler Evans [1], Maya I. Fabrikant [1], Andrew Fischer [1], Cameron Foltz [1], Michael Foss-Feig [1], David Francois [1], Brad Freyberg [1], Charles Gao [1], Robert Garay [1], Jane Garvin [1], David M. Gaudiosi [1], Christopher N. Gilbreth [1], Josh Giles [1], Erin Glynn [1], Jeff Graves [1], Azure Hansen [1], David Hayes [1], Lukas Heidemann [2], Bob Higashi [5], Tyler Hilbun [1], Jordan Hines [6], Ariana Hlavaty [2], Kyle Hoffman [1], Ian M. Hoffman [1], Craig Holliman [7], Isobel Hooper [2], Bob Horning [5], James Hostetter [3], Daniel Hothem [8], Jack Houlton [1], Jared Hout [1], Ross Hutson [1], Ryan T. Jacobs [1], Trent Jacobs [1], Melf Johannsen [2], Jacob Johansen [1], Loren Jones [1], Sydney Julian [1], Ryan Jung [5], Aidan Keay [2], Todd Klein [5], Mark Koch [2], Ryo Kondo [1], Chang Kong [1], Asa Kosto [1], Alan Lawrence [2], David Liefer [1], Michelle Lollie [1], Dominic Lucchetti [1], Nathan K. Lysne [7], Christian Lytle [1], Callum MacPherson [2], Andrew Malm [1], Spencer Mather [1], Brian Mathewson [1], Daniel Maxwell [3], Lauren McCaffrey [1], Hannah McDougall [1], Robin Mendoza [1], Michael Mills [1], Richard Morrison [2], Louis Narmour [1], Nhung Nguyen [1], Lora Nugent [1], Scott Olson [5], Daniel Ouellette [5], Jeremy Parks [1], Zach Peters [1], Jessie Petricka [1], Juan M. Pino [1], Frank Polito [1], Matthias Preidl [5], Gabriel Price [1], Timothy Proctor [8], McKinley Pugh [1], Noah Ratcliff [1], Daisy Raymondson [1], Peter Rhodes [1], Conrad Roman [1], Craig Roy [2], Ciaran Ryan-Anderson [1], Fernando Betanzo Sanchez [2], George Sangiolo [2], Tatiana Sawadski [2], Andrew Schaffer [3], Peter Schow [1], Jon Sedlacek [3], Henry Semenenko [2], Peter Shevchuk [1], Susan Shore [5], Peter Siegfried [1], Kartik Singhal [1], Seyon Sivarajah [2], Thomas Skripka [1], Lucas Sletten [3], Ben Spaun [1], R. Tucker Sprenkle [1], Paul Stoufer [1], Mariel Tader [1], Stephen F. Taylor [3], Travis H. Thompson [2], Raanan Tobey [1], Anh Tran [1], Tam Tran [1], Grahame Vittorini [3], Curtis Volin [3], Jim Walker [1], Sam White [2], Douglas Wilson [2], Quinn Wolf [1], Chester Wringe [2], Kevin Young [8], Jian Zheng [1], Kristen Zuraski [1], Charles H. Baldwin [1], Alex Chernoguzov [1], John P. Gaebler [1], Steven J. Sanders [1], Brian Neyenhuis [1], Russell Stutz [1], Justin G. Bohnet [1]

Abstract

We report on Quantinuum Helios, a 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum processor based on the quantum charge-coupled device (QCCD) architecture. Helios features $^{137}$Ba$^{+}$ hyperfine qubits, all-to-all connectivity enabled by a rotatable ion storage ring connecting two quantum operation regions by a junction, speed improvements from parallelized operations, and a new software stack with real-time compilation of dynamic programs. Averaged over all operational zones in the system, we achieve average infidelities of $2.5(1)\times10^{-5}$ for single-qubit gates, $7.9(2)\times10^{-4}$ for two-qubit gates, and $4.8(6)\times10^{-4}$ for state preparation and measurement, none of which are fundamentally limited and likely able to be improved. These component infidelities are predictive of system-level performance in both random Clifford circuits and random circuit sampling, the latter demonstrating that Helios operates well beyond the reach of classical simulation and establishes a new frontier of fidelity and complexity for quantum computers.

Certified randomness using a trapped-ion quantum processor

Minzhao Liu [1,3,4], Ruslan Shaydulin [1], Pradeep Niroula [1], Matthew DeCross [2], Shih-Han Hung [5,6], Wen Yu Kon [1], Enrique Cervero-Martín, Kaushik Chakraborty [1], Omar Amer [1], Scott Aaronson [5], Atithi Acharya [1], Yuri Alexeev [3], K. Jordan Berg [2], Shouvanik Chakrabarti [1], Florian J. Curchod [7], Joan M. Dreiling [2], Neal Erickson [2], Cameron Foltz [2], Michael Foss-Feig [2], David Hayes [2], Travis S. Humble [8], Niraj Kumar [1], Jeffrey Larson [9], Danylo Lykov [1,3], Michael Mills [2], Steven A. Moses [2], Brian Neyenhuis [2], Shaltiel Eloul [1], Peter Siegfried [2], James Walker [2], Charles Lim [1], Marco Pistoia [1]

Abstract

While quantum computers have the potential to perform a wide range of practically important tasks beyond the capabilities of classical computers, realizing this potential remains a challenge. One such task is to use an untrusted remote device to generate random bits that can be certified to contain a certain amount of entropy. Certified randomness has many applications but is fundamentally impossible to achieve solely by classical computation. In this work, we demonstrate the generation of certifiably random bits using the 56-qubit Quantinuum H2-1 trapped-ion quantum computer accessed over the internet. Our protocol leverages the classical hardness of recent random circuit sampling demonstrations: a client generates quantum "challenge" circuits using a small randomness seed, sends them to an untrusted quantum server to execute, and verifies the server's results. We analyze the security of our protocol against a restricted class of realistic near-term adversaries. Using classical verification with measured combined sustained performance of $1.1\times10^{18}$ floating-point operations per second across multiple supercomputers, we certify $71,313$ bits of entropy under this restricted adversary and additional assumptions. Our results demonstrate a step towards the practical applicability of today's quantum computers.

Qutrit Toric Code and Parafermions in Trapped Ions

Mohsin Iqbal [1], Anasuya Lyons [2], Chiu Fan Bowen Lo [2], Nathanan Tantivasadakarn [3,4], Joan Dreiling, Cameron Foltz [4], Thomas M. Gatterman [4], Dan Gresh [4], Nathan Hewitt [4], Craig A. Holliman [4], Jacob Johansen [4], Brian Neyenhuis [4], Yohei Matsuoka [4], Michael Mills [4], Steven A. Moses [4], Peter Siegfried [4], Ashvin Vishwanath [2], Ruben Verresen [5,2], Henrik Dreyer [1]

Abstract

The development of programmable quantum devices can be measured by the complexity of manybody states that they are able to prepare. Among the most significant are topologically ordered states of matter, which enable robust quantum information storage and processing. While topological orders are more readily accessible with qudits, experimental realisations have thus far been limited to lattice models of qubits. Here, we prepare a ground state of the Z3 toric code state on 24 qutrits in a trapped ion quantum processor with fidelity per qutrit exceeding 96.5(3)%. We manipulate two types of defects which go beyond the conventional qubit toric code: a parafermion, and its bound state which is related to charge conjugation symmetry. We further demonstrate defect fusion and the transfer of entanglement between anyons and defects, which we use to control topological qutrits. Our work opens up the space of long-range entangled states with qudit degrees of freedom for use in quantum simulation and universal error-correcting codes.

Experimental Demonstration of Break-Even for the Compact Fermionic Encoding

Ramil Nigmatullin [1], Kevin Hemery [1], Khaldoon Ghanem [1], Steven Moses [2], Dan Gresh [2], Peter Siegfried [2], Michael Mills [2], Thomas Gatterman [2], Nathan Hewitt [2], Etienne Granet [1], Henrik Dreyer [1]

Abstract

The utility of solving the Fermi-Hubbard model has been estimated in the billions of dollars. Digital quantum computers can in principle address this task, but have so far been limited to quasi one-dimensional models. This is because of exponential overheads caused by the interplay of noise and the non-locality of the mapping between fermions and qubits. Here, we show experimentally that a recently developed local encoding can overcome this problem. We develop a new compilation scheme, called "corner hopping", that reduces the cost of simulating fermionic hopping by 42% which allows us to conduct the largest digital quantum simulations of a fermionic model to date, using a trapped ion quantum computer to prepare adiabatically the ground state of a 6 x 6 spinless Fermi-Hubbard model encoded in 48 physical qubits. We also develop two new error mitigation schemes for systems with conserved quantities, one based on local postselection and one on extrapolation of local observables. Our results suggest that Fermi-Hubbard models beyond classical simulability can be addressed by digital quantum computers without large increases in gate fidelity.

Experiments with the 4D Surface Code on a QCCD Quantum Computer

Noah Berthusen [1,2], Joan Dreiling [2], Cameron Foltz [2], John P. Gaebler [2], Thomas M. Gatterman [2], Dan Gresh [2], Nathan Hewitt [2], Michael Mills [2], Steven A. Moses [2], Brian Neyenhuis [2], Peter Siegfried [2], David Hayes [2]

Abstract

Single-shot quantum error correction has the potential to speed up quantum computations by removing the need for multiple rounds of syndrome extraction in order to be fault-tolerant. Using Quantinuum's H2 trapped-ion quantum computer, we implement the [[33,1,4]] 4D surface code and perform the first experimental demonstration of single-shot quantum error correction with bare ancilla qubits. We conduct memory experiments comparing the 2D and 4D surface codes and find that despite differences in qubit use and syndrome extraction circuit depth, the 4D surface code matches or outperforms the 2D surface code in both the fault-tolerant and single-shot regimes.

Measuring the Loschmidt amplitude for finite-energy properties of the Fermi-Hubbard model on an ion-trap quantum computer

Kévin Hémery, Khaldoon Ghanem [1], Eleanor Crane [1,2], Sara L. Campbell [3], Joan M. Dreiling [3], Caroline Figgatt [3], Cameron Foltz [3], John P. Gaebler [3], Jacob Johansen [3], Michael Mills [3], Steven A. Moses [3], Juan M. Pino [3], Anthony Ransford [3], Mary Rowe [3], Peter Siegfried [3], Russell P. Stutz [3], Henrik Dreyer [1], Alexander Schuckert [1,2], Ramil Nigmatullin [4]

Abstract

Calculating the equilibrium properties of condensed matter systems is one of the promising applications of near-term quantum computing. Recently, hybrid quantum-classical time-series algorithms have been proposed to efficiently extract these properties from a measurement of the Loschmidt amplitude $\langle ψ| e^{-i \hat H t}|ψ\rangle$ from initial states $|ψ\rangle$ and a time evolution under the Hamiltonian $\hat H$ up to short times $t$. In this work, we study the operation of this algorithm on a present-day quantum computer. Specifically, we measure the Loschmidt amplitude for the Fermi-Hubbard model on a $16$-site ladder geometry (32 orbitals) on the Quantinuum H2-1 trapped-ion device. We assess the effect of noise on the Loschmidt amplitude and implement algorithm-specific error mitigation techniques. By using a thus-motivated error model, we numerically analyze the influence of noise on the full operation of the quantum-classical algorithm by measuring expectation values of local observables at finite energies. Finally, we estimate the resources needed for scaling up the algorithm.

Evidence of Scaling Advantage for the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm on a Classically Intractable Problem

Ruslan Shaydulin [1], Changhao Li [1], Shouvanik Chakrabarti [1], Matthew DeCross [2], Dylan Herman [1], Niraj Kumar [1], Jeffrey Larson [3], Danylo Lykov [1,4], Pierre Minssen [1], Yue Sun [1], Yuri Alexeev [4], Joan M. Dreiling [2], John P. Gaebler [2], Thomas M. Gatterman [2], Justin A. Gerber [2], Kevin Gilmore [2], Dan Gresh [2], Nathan Hewitt [2], Chandler V. Horst [2], Shaohan Hu [1], Jacob Johansen [2], Mitchell Matheny [2], Tanner Mengle [2], Michael Mills [2], Steven A. Moses [2], Brian Neyenhuis [2], Peter Siegfried [2], Romina Yalovetzky [1], Marco Pistoia [1]

Abstract

The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a leading candidate algorithm for solving optimization problems on quantum computers. However, the potential of QAOA to tackle classically intractable problems remains unclear. Here, we perform an extensive numerical investigation of QAOA on the low autocorrelation binary sequences (LABS) problem, which is classically intractable even for moderately sized instances. We perform noiseless simulations with up to 40 qubits and observe that the runtime of QAOA with fixed parameters scales better than branch-and-bound solvers, which are the state-of-the-art exact solvers for LABS. The combination of QAOA with quantum minimum finding gives the best empirical scaling of any algorithm for the LABS problem. We demonstrate experimental progress in executing QAOA for the LABS problem using an algorithm-specific error detection scheme on Quantinuum trapped-ion processors. Our results provide evidence for the utility of QAOA as an algorithmic component that enables quantum speedups.

Non-Abelian Topological Order and Anyons on a Trapped-Ion Processor

Mohsin Iqbal [1], Nathanan Tantivasadakarn [2], Ruben Verresen [3], Sara L. Campbell [4], Joan M. Dreiling [4], Caroline Figgatt [4], John P. Gaebler [4], Jacob Johansen [4], Michael Mills [4], Steven A. Moses [4], Juan M. Pino [4], Anthony Ransford [4], Mary Rowe [4], Peter Siegfried [4], Russell P. Stutz [4], Michael Foss-Feig [4], Ashvin Vishwanath [3], Henrik Dreyer [1]

Abstract

Non-Abelian topological order (TO) is a coveted state of matter with remarkable properties, including quasiparticles that can remember the sequence in which they are exchanged. These anyonic excitations are promising building blocks of fault-tolerant quantum computers. However, despite extensive efforts, non-Abelian TO and its excitations have remained elusive, unlike the simpler quasiparticles or defects in Abelian TO. In this work, we present the first unambiguous realization of non-Abelian TO and demonstrate control of its anyons. Using an adaptive circuit on Quantinuum's H2 trapped-ion quantum processor, we create the ground state wavefunction of $D_4$ TO on a kagome lattice of 27 qubits, with fidelity per site exceeding $98.4\%$. By creating and moving anyons along Borromean rings in spacetime, anyon interferometry detects an intrinsically non-Abelian braiding process. Furthermore, tunneling non-Abelions around a torus creates all 22 ground states, as well as an excited state with a single anyon -- a peculiar feature of non-Abelian TO. This work illustrates the counterintuitive nature of non-Abelions and enables their study in quantum devices.