Jeffrey Larson

Certified randomness using a trapped-ion quantum processor

Minzhao Liu [1,3,4], Ruslan Shaydulin [1], Pradeep Niroula [1], Matthew DeCross [2], Shih-Han Hung [5,6], Wen Yu Kon [1], Enrique Cervero-Martín, Kaushik Chakraborty [1], Omar Amer [1], Scott Aaronson [5], Atithi Acharya [1], Yuri Alexeev [3], K. Jordan Berg [2], Shouvanik Chakrabarti [1], Florian J. Curchod [7], Joan M. Dreiling [2], Neal Erickson [2], Cameron Foltz [2], Michael Foss-Feig [2], David Hayes [2], Travis S. Humble [8], Niraj Kumar [1], Jeffrey Larson [9], Danylo Lykov [1,3], Michael Mills [2], Steven A. Moses [2], Brian Neyenhuis [2], Shaltiel Eloul [1], Peter Siegfried [2], James Walker [2], Charles Lim [1], Marco Pistoia [1]

Abstract

While quantum computers have the potential to perform a wide range of practically important tasks beyond the capabilities of classical computers, realizing this potential remains a challenge. One such task is to use an untrusted remote device to generate random bits that can be certified to contain a certain amount of entropy. Certified randomness has many applications but is fundamentally impossible to achieve solely by classical computation. In this work, we demonstrate the generation of certifiably random bits using the 56-qubit Quantinuum H2-1 trapped-ion quantum computer accessed over the internet. Our protocol leverages the classical hardness of recent random circuit sampling demonstrations: a client generates quantum "challenge" circuits using a small randomness seed, sends them to an untrusted quantum server to execute, and verifies the server's results. We analyze the security of our protocol against a restricted class of realistic near-term adversaries. Using classical verification with measured combined sustained performance of $1.1\times10^{18}$ floating-point operations per second across multiple supercomputers, we certify $71,313$ bits of entropy under this restricted adversary and additional assumptions. Our results demonstrate a step towards the practical applicability of today's quantum computers.

End-to-End Protocol for High-Quality QAOA Parameters with Few Shots

Tianyi Hao [1], Zichang He [1], Ruslan Shaydulin [1], Jeffrey Larson [2], Marco Pistoia [1]

Abstract

The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a quantum heuristic for combinatorial optimization that has been demonstrated to scale better than state-of-the-art classical solvers for some problems. For a given problem instance, QAOA performance depends crucially on the choice of the parameters. While average-case optimal parameters are available in many cases, meaningful performance gains can be obtained by fine-tuning these parameters for a given instance. This task is especially challenging, however, when the number of circuit executions (shots) is limited. In this work, we develop an end-to-end protocol that combines multiple parameter settings and fine-tuning techniques. We use large-scale numerical experiments to optimize the protocol for the shot-limited setting and observe that optimizers with the simplest internal model (linear) perform best. We implement the optimized pipeline on a trapped-ion processor using up to 32 qubits and 5 QAOA layers, and we demonstrate that the pipeline is robust to small amounts of hardware noise. To the best of our knowledge, these are the largest demonstrations of QAOA parameter fine-tuning on a trapped-ion processor in terms of 2-qubit gate count.

Evidence of Scaling Advantage for the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm on a Classically Intractable Problem

Ruslan Shaydulin [1], Changhao Li [1], Shouvanik Chakrabarti [1], Matthew DeCross [2], Dylan Herman [1], Niraj Kumar [1], Jeffrey Larson [3], Danylo Lykov [1,4], Pierre Minssen [1], Yue Sun [1], Yuri Alexeev [4], Joan M. Dreiling [2], John P. Gaebler [2], Thomas M. Gatterman [2], Justin A. Gerber [2], Kevin Gilmore [2], Dan Gresh [2], Nathan Hewitt [2], Chandler V. Horst [2], Shaohan Hu [1], Jacob Johansen [2], Mitchell Matheny [2], Tanner Mengle [2], Michael Mills [2], Steven A. Moses [2], Brian Neyenhuis [2], Peter Siegfried [2], Romina Yalovetzky [1], Marco Pistoia [1]

Abstract

The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a leading candidate algorithm for solving optimization problems on quantum computers. However, the potential of QAOA to tackle classically intractable problems remains unclear. Here, we perform an extensive numerical investigation of QAOA on the low autocorrelation binary sequences (LABS) problem, which is classically intractable even for moderately sized instances. We perform noiseless simulations with up to 40 qubits and observe that the runtime of QAOA with fixed parameters scales better than branch-and-bound solvers, which are the state-of-the-art exact solvers for LABS. The combination of QAOA with quantum minimum finding gives the best empirical scaling of any algorithm for the LABS problem. We demonstrate experimental progress in executing QAOA for the LABS problem using an algorithm-specific error detection scheme on Quantinuum trapped-ion processors. Our results provide evidence for the utility of QAOA as an algorithmic component that enables quantum speedups.

Characterizing Error Mitigation by Symmetry Verification in QAOA

Ashish Kakkar [1], Jeffrey Larson [1], Alexey Galda [1], Ruslan Shaydulin [1]

Abstract

Hardware errors are a major obstacle to demonstrating quantum advantage with the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA). Recently, symmetry verification has been proposed and empirically demonstrated to boost the quantum state fidelity, the expected solution quality, and the success probability of QAOA on a superconducting quantum processor. Symmetry verification uses parity checks that leverage the symmetries of the objective function to be optimized. We develop a theoretical framework for analyzing this approach under local noise and derive explicit formulas for fidelity improvements on problems with global $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry. We numerically investigate the symmetry verification on the MaxCut problem and identify the error regimes in which this approach improves the QAOA objective. We observe that these regimes correspond to the error rates present in near-term hardware. We further demonstrate the efficacy of symmetry verification on an IonQ trapped ion quantum processor where an improvement in the QAOA objective of up to 19.2\% is observed.