Kenneth Rudinger

Heisenberg-limited calibration of entangling gates with robust phase estimation

Kenneth Rudinger [1], J. P. Marceaux [1], Akel Hashim [3], David I. Santiago [4], Irfan Siddiqi [3,4,5], Kevin C. Young [1]

Abstract

The calibration of high-quality two-qubit entangling gates is an essential component in engineering large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computers. However, many standard calibration techniques are based on randomized circuits that are only quadratically sensitive to calibration errors. As a result, these approaches are inefficient, requiring many experimental shots to achieve acceptable performance. In this work, we demonstrate that robust phase estimation can enable high-precision, Heisenberg-limited estimates of coherent errors in multi-qubit gates. Equipped with an efficient estimator, the calibration problem may be reduced to a simple optimization loop that minimizes the estimated coherent error. We experimentally demonstrate our calibration protocols by improving the operation of a two-qubit controlled-Z gate on a superconducting processor, and we validate the improved performance with gate set tomography. Our methods are applicable to gates in other quantum hardware platforms such as ion traps and neutral atoms, and on other multi-qubit gates, such as CNOT or iSWAP.

Experimental Characterization of Crosstalk Errors with Simultaneous Gate Set Tomography

Kenneth Rudinger [1], Craig W. Hogle [2], Ravi K. Naik [3], Akel Hashim [3], Daniel Lobser [2], David I. Santiago [3,4], Matthew D. Grace [1], Erik Nielsen [1], Timothy Proctor [1], Stefan Seritan [1], Susan M. Clark [2], Robin Blume-Kohout [1], Irfan Siddiqi [3,4,5], Kevin C. Young [1]

Abstract

Crosstalk is a leading source of failure in multiqubit quantum information processors. It can arise from a wide range of disparate physical phenomena, and can introduce subtle correlations in the errors experienced by a device. Several hardware characterization protocols are able to detect the presence of crosstalk, but few provide sufficient information to distinguish various crosstalk errors from one another. In this article we describe how gate set tomography, a protocol for detailed characterization of quantum operations, can be used to identify and characterize crosstalk errors in quantum information processors. We demonstrate our methods on a two-qubit trapped-ion processor and a two-qubit subsystem of a superconducting transmon processor.

Detecting and tracking drift in quantum information processors

Timothy Proctor [1], Melissa Revelle [2], Erik Nielsen [1], Kenneth Rudinger [1], Daniel Lobser [2], Peter Maunz [2], Robin Blume-Kohout [1], Kevin Young [1]

Abstract

If quantum information processors are to fulfill their potential, the diverse errors that affect them must be understood and suppressed. But errors typically fluctuate over time, and the most widely used tools for characterizing them assume static error modes and rates. This mismatch can cause unheralded failures, misidentified error modes, and wasted experimental effort. Here, we demonstrate a spectral analysis technique for resolving time dependence in quantum processors. Our method is fast, simple, and statistically sound. It can be applied to time-series data from any quantum processor experiment. We use data from simulations and trapped-ion qubit experiments to show how our method can resolve time dependence when applied to popular characterization protocols, including randomized benchmarking, gate set tomography, and Ramsey spectroscopy. In the experiments, we detect instability and localize its source, implement drift control techniques to compensate for this instability, and then demonstrate that the instability has been suppressed.

Experimental demonstration of cheap and accurate phase estimation

Kenneth Rudinger [1], Shelby Kimmel [2], Daniel Lobser [3], Peter Maunz [3]

Abstract

We demonstrate experimental implementation of robust phase estimation (RPE) to learn the phases of X and Y rotations on a trapped $\textrm{Yb}^+$ ion qubit. We estimate these phases with uncertainties less than $4\cdot10^{-4}$ radians using as few as 176 total experimental samples per phase, and our estimates exhibit Heisenberg scaling. Unlike standard phase estimation protocols, RPE neither assumes perfect state preparation and measurement, nor requires access to ancillae. We cross-validate the results of RPE with the more resource-intensive protocol of gate set tomography.

Demonstration of qubit operations below a rigorous fault tolerance threshold with gate set tomography

Robin Blume-Kohout [1], John King Gamble [1], Erik Nielsen [2], Kenneth Rudinger [1], Jonathan Mizrahi [2], Kevin Fortier [2], Peter Maunz [2]

Abstract

Quantum information processors promise fast algorithms for problems inaccessible to classical computers. But since qubits are noisy and error-prone, they will depend on fault-tolerant quantum error correction (FTQEC) to compute reliably. Quantum error correction can protect against general noise if -- and only if -- the error in each physical qubit operation is smaller than a certain threshold. The threshold for general errors is quantified by their diamond norm. Until now, qubits have been assessed primarily by randomized benchmarking, which reports a different "error rate" that is not sensitive to all errors, and cannot be compared directly to diamond norm thresholds. Here we use gate set tomography (GST) to completely characterize operations on a trapped-Yb$^+$-ion qubit and demonstrate with very high ($>95\%$) confidence that they satisfy a rigorous threshold for FTQEC (diamond norm $\leq6.7\times10^{-4}$).